![]() |
Parshas Vayetze 5761
At the time of this writing, Palestinian terrorists are brazenly
attempting to capture Kever Rachel, Rachel's tomb. What relevance do they
have to the tomb of our Bubby Rachel? How can we bring this nonsensical
act into the realm of understanding?
"And it was, in the morning, that behold it was Leah (Breishis
29:25)!" Note the difficulty: Was she not Leah the evening before as
well? Thus, explains Rashi, that in the evening, under the Chuppah,
Yaakov actually thought Leah was Rachel. Yaakov and Rachel, in
anticipation of Lavan's treachery, devised a secret sign to allow Yaakov
to disclose the deception. However, when Rachel saw her father setting up
Leah in her place, she had a change of heart. "My sister will be
mortified!" Rachel, overwhelmed by sympathy, gave the secret sign to her
sister.
A superficial reading makes Rachel's act sound very nice and
altruistic. After all, she spared her sister shame. Surely, each of us
would have done the same.
Taking a deeper, more accurate look, however, we will discover
that concealed between the lines lies a superhuman self-sacrifice of
unparalleled proportions.
Remember, Yaakov worked for Rachel for seven years. Their
profound love made it seem like only a few days (v. 20). During all this
time, Rachel anticipated the day she would finally marry her beloved.
At the last minute, Rachel realized that her unscrupulous father
had deceived them, and was dressing Leah in the wedding gown. How would
we have felt under such circumstances? She was losing her husband! She
had no way of knowing that Yaakov would agree afterward to marry her as
well. As far as she was concerned, she was relinquishing Yaakov forever.
All Rachel had to do was make a scene so that Yaakov would realize
that she was not the bride. But Rachel kept quiet. Moreover, she gave
her sister the secret sign, so that Yaakov would think he was actually
marrying Rachel. Rachel did everything possible to spare her sister
disgrace. All this, despite the permanent loss of her husband.
In addition, Yaakov was not just a husband. He was to become the
third and culminating patriarch of the Jewish nation. Rachel had a
one-time opportunity to mother the Shivtei Kah, the tribes of Hashem.
Furthermore, by failing to marry Yaakov, Rachel would surely be
suggested as a shidduch for the wicked Esav. "Everyone was saying: Rivka
has two sons, and Lavan has two daughters. The older daughter for the
older son, and the younger daughter for the younger son (Rashi 29:17)."
Leah had been the natural bashert (intended) for Esav. Now that Leah was
marrying Yaakov, Rachel would obviously be expected to marry Esav.
Moreover, Esav apparently had his eyes set on Rachel (See Rashi
30:22,33:7). Rachel was systematically forfeiting absolutely everything
for her sister's sake!
But the greatest question of all: Why did Rachel do it? Why
didn't she protest this grave injustice? And why did she provide Leah
with the secret sign?
Says the Mishna: "One who humiliates his friend publicly... though
he may have Torah and good deeds, he has no share in the World to Come
(Avos 3:11)." A person can be a consummate Tzaddik, he can learn Torah
24/7, he can donate one fifth of his income to Tzedaka, he can dedicate
his life to helping others, yet he will have no place in the Afterlife!
"All who descend to Gehinnom ascend except for three, who descend
and never ascend... and a person who humiliates his friend publicly."
What goes down, must come up. Except for this.
"A person should sooner throw himself into a fiery furnace, before
he embarrasses his friend publicly (Kesuvos 67b)." According to some
opinions, a person is obligated to give up his life before humiliating
someone! (Tosfos, Sotah 10b; Shaarei Teshuva 3:139; Minchas Shlomo I:7)
Consequently, Rachel did not protest. Had she made a scene, what
would she have gained? She may have married Yaakov, mothered the twelve
tribes, and spared herself a life with Esav, but in the end she would have
lost. Of what benefit are all these things if one has no place to enjoy
it after all is said and done?
But from Rachel, we learn an additional lesson. To absolve
herself from eternal condemnation, it would have been sufficient to keep
quiet. Any shame Leah experienced would have been attributed to her
father, Lavan. Yet Rachel did far more that simply keep quiet. She gave
the secret code to Leah. Totally beyond anyone's expectations, Rachel
went the extra mile to spare Leah pain.
What reward did Rachel receive for her unrivaled self-sacrifice?
First of all, she lost nothing. Human logic dictates that a person is
justified in cutting corners to receive what he feels is coming to him.
Had Rachel cut corners, had she contributed even indirectly to her
sister's humiliation, she would have ended up bankrupt. By doing what was
right, Rachel lost nothing. She married Yaakov, became one of the
matriarchs, and thus stayed out of the clutches of Esav.
Furthermore, let us not forget that Rachel was born barren; she
was incapable of giving birth (Breishis 29:31). Had she protested, and
subsequently married Yaakov in a straightforward manner, she may never
have mothered a child. It was solely due to her willingness to forego her
future that she attained motherhood (See Rashi 30:22).
But the greatest reward of all is evident from the Medrash
(Introduction to Eichah Rabba). After the destruction of the Bais
HaMikdash, various Tzaddikim arose to plead on behalf of the Jewish
people. It was an all-star cast. Avraham, Yitzchak, Yaakov, Moshe, etc.,
all tried to rescind the tragic decree and to restore the Jewish people to
their former glory. One by one, their prayers were rejected by Hashem;
All their vast merits did not help them! Finally, one last voice made
itself heard:
"At that moment, Rachel our mother jumped up and said to Hashem,
'Master of the universe, You well know that Your servant Yaakov loved me
deeply, and he worked for my father for seven years. When those seven
years were up and the time of my wedding to my husband arrived, my father
schemed to substitute my sister for me, and this was terribly difficult
for me. I informed my husband, and I gave him a sign so that he could
distinguish between my sister and me, to thwart my father's scheme.
Afterwards, I regretted what I had done, and I suppressed my yearning. I
had mercy on my sister, so that she would feel no shame. In the evening,
they gave my sister to my husband in my stead, and I gave my sister all of
the signs that I had given to my husband, so that he would think she was
Rachel... I was not jealous of her, and I did not humiliate her. If I,
mere flesh and blood, dust and ashes, did not envy my competitor and did
not humiliate her, You, the everlasting, merciful King, why did You envy
idolatry which has no substance, and You exiled my children, and they were
killed by the sword, and the enemies did with them as they pleased?'
"Immediately, Hashem's mercy was aroused and He said, 'For you,
Rachel, will I return Yisrael to their place.' As it is written, 'Thus
said Hashem, A voice is heard on high, wailing, bitter weeping, Rachel
weeps for her children; she refuses to be consoled for her children, for
they are gone. Thus said Hashem, Restrain your voice from weeping and
your eyes from tears; for there is reward for your accomplishment and they
will return from the enemy's land. There is hope for your future and your
children will return to their border.'(Yirmiyah 31:14-16)"
The secret to our success and to our ultimate redemption was
revealed by Rachel Imeinu. Follow in her footsteps, develop sensitivities
to our fellow man, abstain from embarrassing others, and Hashem will
rescue us posthaste. The Palestinians, hoping to break our spirit, focus
their rage on a tomb. Unbeknownst to them, the real secret lies within
us.
"There is hope for your future your children will return!"
(C) 5767/2006 by Yeshivat Netiv Aryeh
All rights reserved. The information published here is protected under international copyright law. You are welcome to copy or print (intact) copies of this information for personal use only. You may also send (intact) copies to other people - whom you personally know - without prior permission. All other forms of reproduction or republishing are prohibited without prior written permission from the copyright owner(s). Such permission is usually given freely, but must be obtained.